Arrêt Marinari (1995) excludes which type of damage when localizing the harm?

Prepare for the DIPR Jurisprudence Test. Utilize flashcards, multiple-choice questions, and comprehensive explanations to enhance your understanding and readiness for the exam.

Multiple Choice

Arrêt Marinari (1995) excludes which type of damage when localizing the harm?

Localisation of the harm focuses on tying the injury to the place where the wrongful act caused the direct damage. Arrêt Marinari clarifies that only direct damage—the immediate, concrete harm from the act—is localized to the source of the risk. Indirect damage, or ricochet damage, are outcomes that arise as secondary consequences and are not tied to the exact location of the initial act, so they are excluded from the localization step. This keeps liability anchored to the act’s origin rather than the wider ripple effects. Therefore, the type of damage that Marinari excludes from localization is indirect (ricochet) damage.

Localisation of the harm focuses on tying the injury to the place where the wrongful act caused the direct damage. Arrêt Marinari clarifies that only direct damage—the immediate, concrete harm from the act—is localized to the source of the risk. Indirect damage, or ricochet damage, are outcomes that arise as secondary consequences and are not tied to the exact location of the initial act, so they are excluded from the localization step. This keeps liability anchored to the act’s origin rather than the wider ripple effects. Therefore, the type of damage that Marinari excludes from localization is indirect (ricochet) damage.

More practice questions